Living Wage

Policy Toolkit
microgradient
What Is It

In 1994, the faith-based coalition BUILD - Baltimoreans United in Leadership Development led the nation’s first successful living wage campaign to ensure that workers hired by private contractors on city-subsidized projects earned above-poverty wages. Since then, more than 120 cities and counties across the country have passed living-wage ordinances, which set wage standards for city employees, government contractors, and companies receiving public subsidies to ensure that public spending creates good family-supporting jobs. Living-wage rates vary from city to city based on the local cost of living and political context; most range from about $9 to $16 per hour.

Living-wage policies are meant to cover the cost of living and are often designed to account for the high cost of health insurance by establishing different wage levels based on whether or not an employer provides health care coverage for employees — requiring higher hourly wages if health insurance is not covered. In addition to public contracting, living-wage provisions have been effectively integrated into community benefits agreements and paired with local and targeted hiring policies that can simultaneously benefit disadvantaged populations and the local economy.

Critics have argued that living-wage laws will kill jobs and put employers out of business and that the cost outweighs the benefit to workers, creating a drag on the local economy. But research shows that higher wages stabilize the lives of low-wage workers and lift families out of poverty, and they also benefit employers by increasing productivity and worker retention.

See Partnership for Working FamiliesGood Jobs First, and National Employment Law Project for more resources on living-wage provisions.

Who Implements It
  • Elected and appointed city officials can promote living-wage requirements through executive orders, ordinances, and resolutions and create specific provisions in public contracting.
     
  • Residents, advocates, and community organizations can organize campaigns to promote living-wage policies and work with business leaders and developers to include living wages in community benefits agreements and other contracts.
     
  • Business leaders can work with community-based organizations and other advocates to ensure local and targeted hiring through community benefits agreements and other types of contracts and to help ensure that training programs are effective and connected to employers.
Considerations

Strong living-wage ordinances should provide for automatic increases linked to the cost of living, include a healthcare differential, and guarantee paid leave for workers. In addition, cities seeking to implement or strengthen living-wage provisions must consider a range of related legal and practical questions.

  • State preemption: State governments may preempt their cities’ ability to enact local living-wage provisions. 26 states have enacted laws preempting local minimum wage or living wages higher than the state minimum.
     
  • Setting wage levels: Local economic analysis and cost-of-living calculators (like those produced by the Economic Policy Institute or Massachusetts Institute of Technology) can help city leaders determine a living-wage rate that reflects the local cost of living. In some cases, the living wage is defined as a percent of the federal poverty level; in others, as a given dollar amount above the federal minimum wage.
     
  • Defining which employers are covered: Living-wage policies can apply to all businesses that contract with local governments or receive economic development subsidies, or they may target specific industries. Living wages can also be included as a project- or area-specific provisions of a community benefits agreement and may even cover all private businesses whose employees work on city-owned land (such as arenas or convention centers).
     
  • Cost-of-living increases: Living-wage ordinances should include some mechanism for regular cost-of-living increases, such as linking the wage to rise with inflation.
     
  • Health-care costs: Living wages should include a health-care differential, setting different wage rates based on whether or not employers provide health insurance for their workers. Ordinances can also call for insurance to be adequate and affordable.
     
  • Paid sick leave and paid time off: Beyond increasing the value of workers’ paychecks, living-wage policies can promote greater job quality and economic stability for working people by requiring employers to provide a certain number of paid sick days and vacation days for employees.
     
  • Prevailing wages: Some living-wage laws require public works contractors to pay the prevailing wage — the usual wages, overtime, and benefits paid in the area to workers in a given occupation.
     
  • Compliance and enforcement: Cities must budget adequate resources and personnel to proactively monitor and audit employers, investigate employee complaints, and enforce living-wage standards.
Where Is It Working

Strong living-wage policies should reflect the local cost of living as well as local market conditions, provide better wages and benefits for workers, improved efficiency and productivity for employers, and increase economic activity for the city or region.

  • The City of New Orleans has been working to address wage and hiring inequity by passing an ordinance to ban the box for city hiring in 2019, and then in 2021 by enacting a $15 per hour living wage for hourly city employees.
     
  • San Diego’s living-wage law, adopted in 2005, has had positive effects on businesses and workers. Covered employees have reported higher standards of living and reduced economic pressure. Employers have reported better retention and improved quality of service, which makes contractors more competitive for future projects and keeps workers motivated. In 2009, 41 percent of employers reported that paying the living wage reduced turnover and absenteeism. Enforcement has been a key element of the policy’s success — in the first decade of the living-wage ordinance, San Diego recouped nearly $600,000 in unpaid wages through compliance reviews and complaint investigations. In 2020, the ordinance covered 228 employers working on 601 city contracts valued at more than $370 million. The city increased the living wage by 8.28 percent to reach $17.91 per hour in 2022.
     
  • In Dallas, city sanitation workers campaigned for a living wage in 2010 when they began calling for a wage increase. Five years later, Dallas City Council approved a living wage of $10.37 an hour for all contractors and subcontractors hired by the city, including trash collectors, janitors, and groundskeepers; wages of construction contractors are negotiated separately. In 2018, they raised the living wage to $11.15 per hour ---a rate they calculated using MIT’s living-wage calculator, which uses geographically specific data related to family spending on food, child care, health insurance, housing, transportation, and other basics. In recent years, as Dallas has posted overall job growth and public sector job growth far above the national average, this living wage policy has had a far-reaching impact.
Related Toolsmanualrectangular

Equitable Contracting and Procurement

Worker-owned Cooperatives

Minimum Wage

Paid Family Leave

Paid Sick Leave

Worker-owned Cooperatives

h3
constellation
Resources, by Type